Extremism in the Interpretation of the Qur’an: Its Manifestations and Consequences

Abstract

This study seeks to define the phenomenon of subjecting Qur’anic interpretation to the instrument of extremist exegesis, which arises from the predominance of personal whims or the desire to champion an ethnic, sectarian, or political doctrine. It further examines how this phenomenon has affected three major domains: scientific objectivity, the intellectual and psychological formation of the interpreter, and the trajectory of society itself.

The study employs both descriptive and analytical methodologies. It proceeds from a central question concerning the scholarly justifications upon which advocates of extremist ideas usually rely: Does the Qur’anic text genuinely support their claims? To answer this question, the study draws upon examples found in classical works of Qur’anic exegesis as well as in the literature of sects and religious denominations.

The research concludes with several findings, the most important of which are: the absence of a sound methodology in any field of inquiry often produces harmful consequences across diverse domains; and the phenomenon of extremist interpretation of the Qur’an, in particular, has led to serious deviation and estrangement from the Qur’an’s balanced and moderate approach. Among its most significant outcomes has been the fragmentation of certain societies in which this phenomenon became widespread.